The voice of The oppressed people
of The Sudan from Numle to Wadi Halfa and from Jananah to Kassla
Darfur rebel leader vows to
topple President al-Bashir
2/27/2009
Fighters from the Justice and Equality Movement (JEM) in Sudan's Western Darfur
region
Anthony Loyd in N'Djamena The leader of the most powerful rebel group in Darfur
said that his forces will redouble their efforts to topple the Sudanese
Government the moment an international arrest warrant is issued against
President al-Bashir. When this warrant comes it is, for us, the end of Bashir's
legitimacy to be President of Sudan,” Khalil Ibrahim, chairman of the Justice
and Equality Movement (JEM), told The Times. “We will work hard to bring him
down ... If he doesn't co-operate with the ICC [International Criminal Court]
the war will intensify.” Prosecutors for the ICC charged the Sudanese President
last year on ten counts — three of genocide, five of crimes against humanity and
two of war crimes. The court, based in The Hague, is considering the application
for an arrest warrant and is expected to rule on March 4.
According to the charge sheet Mr al-Bashir “masterminded and implemented a plan
to destroy in substantial part the Fur, Masalit and Zaghawa groups” during a
campaign of ethnic persecution in the Darfur region that the UN estimates has
cost 300,000 lives in five years. Advocates of the ICC say that a warrant is
overdue and that the court has been the only entity to succeed in pressurising
Khartoum towards ending the war in Darfur. Its critics — China, Russia and the
African Union among them — say that an ICC warrant will put an end to hopes for
a peace process and increase violence. Since he was charged Mr al-Bashir has
been soliciting support from the African Union and Arab nations. Dr Ibrahim, who
spoke to The Times in Chad, had just returned from a round of exploratory peace
talks with a Sudanese delegation in Qatar last week, where officials from both
warring parties signed a memorandum of goodwill and understanding. “The
[Sudanese] Government is unpredictable,” he said, seated in an orchard on the
banks of the Chari River outside N'Djamena, the capital of Chad. “They never
honour any agreement they sign.”
Although it is still no match for the Sudanese Army, the JEM has rapidly become
the dominant force among the splintered Darfur insurgency since an audacious
attack by hundreds of its fighters on Omdurman in May. A JEM delegation was
invited to Washington for bilateral talks with US officials last month, and it
was the only rebel group invited to the negotiations in Qatar — to the anger of
rival rebel factions from the Sudan Liberation Army (SLA). This, Dr Ibrahim
maintained, was because since 2006 the SLA had fractured into 27 groups and
that, like it or not, the JEM was the only cohesive presence on the battlefield
posing a credible threat to Mr al-Bashir.
“JEM is fighting alone on the ground,” he said, “shouldering the whole issue
because there are no other real movements on the ground.”
Western diplomats believe that the Qatari talks have little chance of success
given the gap between the ambitions of the JEM - which include control of
Khartoum and the transformation of Sudan into a federation of autonomous regions
— and Mr al-Bashir's desire to cling to power. Few major concessions were
extracted from either side in Qatar. The rebel delegation turned down a request
to sign a cessation of hostilities until their own list of preliminary demands
had been accepted, which the Sudanese refused.
The only tangible concession was a commitment from each side to release
prisoners of war. At the weekend Sudan released 24 rebels in response to the
release of 21 government prisoners last week. The rebels said however that they
will not return to Qatar for a second round of talks until all their men are
free.
The fear among the international community is that the conflict will become a
war of secession and will spread to neighbouring countries.
While the stated aim of JEM is to preserve the territorial integrity of Sudan it
is equally clear that the rebels are ready to divide the country. “JEM is a
national movement and we regard autonomy for the regions as a key to peace,” Dr
Ibrahim said. “But if peace does not come quickly Kordofan [a province in
central Sudan] and Darfur would have to form their own entity — Western Sudan —
with the White Nile as its border. If there was no peace then this part would
have to become its own country.
“We are not going to ask to control Darfur and Kordofan through peace talks if
they [the Government] are not going to give it — we'll take it.”
Racism and rebellionThe Darfur conflict began in 2003 when mainly black African
rebels started attacking police stations, military convoys and army outposts in
response to “racist policies of neglect” by the Arab-dominated Government. The
Sudanese Army responded with massive air and land offensives on rebel
strongholds
An ICC charge sheet alleges that President al-Bashir “failed to defeat the armed
movements so he went after the people. His motives were largely political. His
intent was genocide”
The Justice and Equality Movement (JEM), unlike other Darfur rebel groups,
has an expansive political agenda, including the overthrow of Mr al-Bashir and
the establishment of a federation. It is funded by Gulf financiers as well as
the Chadian Government, with whom it shares tribal ties
Khalil Ibrahim, JEM's leader, is a former government official and supporter of
the hardline Islamist politician Hassan al-Turabi. The group has had to tone
down its Islamic rhetoric to extend its support among Darfur's people JEM was
heavily criticised in Darfur for choosing to attend preliminary peace talks in
Qatar alone, rather than presenting a united front against Khartoum. JEM insists
that all Darfur groups will be represented if the talks progress towards a peace
deal, but it refuses to share a negotiating table with factions of the
once-dominant Sudan Liberation Army
